Here are some notes taken during the first discussion we (kom.post) had in the Studio in order to work with all of you. As we wanted to propose you an other way to introduce yourselves to each other: not under the mere principle of Identity card (I come from…I am…years old…), we thought that it would be interesting to do this exercise ourselves as well!
Indeed, during these 3 Days in Reims, we all took, temporally, a shared and common identity: the “spectator”. This is the common denominator of this process and ground of research we really started to activate all together in December. But, more than trying to build a strong and consensual group under it, we found more interesting to, from this common given, call for the differences and singularities.
Spectator yes, but what kind of spectator I am?
What made me as a spectator? What are the references, the readings, the things watched… which really formed my eyes and made of me this unique spectator at the same time when they transformed me in an essentially “sharable” individual who can communicate and be understood by all these other very unique spectators…
Same and differences…
And this balance of common and singular identities is even more important not to forget and to always put in question when our main place of residence is Europe: where subjects are, precisely under a same identity (european) but with so may differences important to preserve as well!
And this was precisely our aim of the 3 days: not to “think about Europe” “places of art in Europe” in a very abstract way, but to find from our direct experiment and situation, some info, line of debates, questions…
And this is sure that “the contemporary spectator” taken as a participant, as someone invited to interact with a proposition he attends and receives with other persons, has a lot to say about the place and possibility of a citizen today.
Yes I am invited, but do I really have the tools for participating fully? Am I thought as subjective or already put in a place, predefined by the Big Others (cultural policies for example…) that I can’t do more than fulfill? How can I really feel involved in this experiment? How can my voice be heard, not as a “new actor” but really as a spectator: the one who is a part of the artistic experiment and all its ephemeral communities, who is curious about art and wants to follow it, to learn about, without obligation to practice it as well?
All these questions of “spectator” are obviously full of political connotations very important to take into account when the political “stage” of the play here, is following the same tendance as contemporary living art: a desire for more participation and inclusion of the supposed “watchers”, taken as a multitude of singularities…
Sure that 3 days were not enough to dig all this problematic but, all the archive collected here in such a short time, is much more than stimulating and a big probe of necessity of this project to go on and on!
discussion YPAL-kom.post15 déc
As It was an intern discussion this is for the moment in french: but open for any spontaneous translations that YPAL knows so well how to wake up (not only Elsa can take this occasion…) thanks!